KUALA LUMPUR (Feb 27): With no prior warning or consultation, the government’s decision to include almost all maintenance and repair (M&R) jobs under the service tax’s scope came as a shock and has left the public ill-prepared for it, according to a tax expert.
Grant Thornton Indirect Tax & Transfer Pricing senior executive director Alan Chung said the tax consultant industry had not been properly consulted nor forewarned about the change that came into effect on Monday (Feb 26).
“Two aspects of this which concern me is first of all this was brought in under the radar — there was no announcement whatsoever until the gazette order was released. Frankly, it caught us (the tax advisers) by surprise,” Chung told The Edge.
Empowering talent from remote areas with equal employment opportunities
The competition for tech talent has existed since before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and with tech advancing rapidly, there is a widening gap between the ever-changing needs of industries and the academic curriculum of tertiary educational institutions. To bridge this gap, passionate industry players are taking bold steps by providing upskilling opportunities that ensure graduates are industry-ready.
“Second, there was no proper consultation with the industry, with tax consultants — this is vital,” he said.
Chung is also concerned about how far-reaching the terms “maintenance” and “repair” are.
“Maintenance and repair are very broad terms, it doesn’t just cover air conditioning systems and elevators, it covers laptops too, everything’s in there. If your television is sent for repairs, it is subject to service tax. The coverage is very wide, that’s one perspective of it,” he said.
While tax consultants have to analyse the impact of this move, the general public and businesses are not prepared for the service tax’s implementation.
“They’ve given us too little time, with no consultation made. Nobody’s prepared for this. So, how we are going to go about this over the next four days is a big issue,” he added, referring to when the 6% service tax will be raised to 8% by March 1.
Another concern Chung raised is the risk of cascading taxation or double taxation.
“Unlike the goods and services tax (GST), whereby there is no cascading of taxes, the service tax has a very high tendency of being subject to (further) tax,” Chung said.
“Tax on tax is a very apparent issue and in terms of like (similar) repair and maintenance services, you can have it cascading across the board,” he added.
As example, Chung cited how a service provider, say Service Provider A, may outsource specialised repair work to Service Provider B, who will charge Service Provider A for the work, which is subject to the service tax. This will then be included in Service Provider A’s bill to the eventual customer which will then be subjected to another round of service tax.
“So, when it comes to repair and maintenance, my worry here is that there will be cascading taxes,” he said.
“Of course, I am advocating for a broadening of the service tax [and] this is something towards that, but please do have some consultation for us to go and ponder over this and see whether there are any negatives from the implementation so we can address them before we implement it,” he said.
When asked whether those who failed to comply with the new service tax amendments on Monday would face any repercussions, Chung replied in the negative.
He said businesses that previously were not registered for the service tax will have until April 1 to implement the tax on the newly included taxable services. Existing registrants are legally required to charge from Monday.
“Nobody on the ground who is affected by this change in legislation has charged for service tax today, [and this issue] is still being debated among professionals in the tax industry. We are trying to interact with the Finance Ministry (MOF) and the customs to deal with this,” Chung said.
“Ultimately, I suspect that they will come up with some form of exemption but it’s going to be trying to rectify something that shouldn’t have appeared in the first place,” he added.
At the time of writing, the MOF has yet to release an official statement on the issue.
By Izzul Ikram.
Source: The Edge Malaysia. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/702440. 27 February 2024.
Container freight rates take a breather. The spike in spot container freight rates has flattened off over the last week. The Drewry World Container Index (WCI,) which has been seeing double-digit percentage weekly increases recently, was up just 1% over the previous week on 11 July at $5,901 per feu. The Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI) slid 1% to 3674.86 [...]
Chinese oil demand likely to underpin tanker market in medium-term. Rising oil demand in China is likely to be a key factor in supporting the tanker market in the coming years, according to analysis from New York broker, Poten & Partners. Following a sharp downturn in tanker contracting that saw the orderbook plunge to new lows before tanker owners started [...]
Singapore port operator says vessel waiting time reduced to two days. PSA Singapore has been grappling congestion caused by the Red Sea crisis and has been reactivating berths that had been previously been closed down. A combination of longer rerouting of container ships via the Cape of Good Hope to avoid attacks by the Houthi in the Red Sea and [...]
Scroll To Top